Edwin Gould, on Behalf of Himself and Others, Creditors of F. Augustus Heinze, Deceased, Respondent, v. Lida M. Fleitmann, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of F. Augustus, Heinze, Deceased Appellant, and Walter A. Fullerton, as Administrator of the Estate of F. Augustus Heinze, Deceased, and as Guardian of F. Augustus Heinze, Jr., an Infant, Respondent
Gould v. Fleitmann, 130 N.E. 897 (N.Y. 1920)Download
Fraudulent conveyance — assignment of life insurance policies payable to estate while insured was insolvent — when assignments will be set aside after death of insured, at suit of judgment creditor.
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 7, 1919, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. Decedent, while insolvent, assigned to his sister, this appellant, four life insurance policies which he held payable to his estate. This assignment was without consideration. It is conceded in the case that he had at the time of the assignment borrowed from the several companies in which such policies were held an amount equal to the full surrender value of the policies. After the assignment he paid the premiums as they became due upon the policies and immediately after the payment of said premiums he, with consent of appellant, borrowed further sums upon the policies to reimburse himself for the premiums thus paid. The referee found that the assignment of these policies without consideration while insolvent was presumptively fraudulent which presumption was not rebutted by the defendants and upon this finding directed judgment setting aside the assignment.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
*570 Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ. Dissent: Crane, J. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.
Authorities cited 0
No citations to other opinions in this database were found.