TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Ripley

In the Matter of the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Sidney D. Ripley, Deceased. the Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; Mary B. Ripley, Individually and as Executrix of Sidney D. Ripley, Deceased, and as Guardian of Annah D. Ripley Et Al., Infants, Respondent

In re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Ripley, 84 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 14, 1908
Judges
<italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
Citations
84 N.E. 1120192 N.Y. 5361908 N.Y. LEXIS 920
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 22, 1907, which affirmed an order of the Nassau County Surrogate’s Court assessing a transfer tax upon the estate of Sidney D. Ripley, deceased.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, oh the ground that the power of appointment created by the will of Sidney Dillon in favor of Sidney Dillon Ripley was limited, and could only be exercised in favor of persons who did not take under the will. That is the meaning of the words in said will “ unless otherwise disposed of as directed by the last will of the one so dying.” The great grandchildren of Sidney Dillon took directly under his will, except as their interests may have been divested or cut down by a valid exercise of the power.

Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1910: 11912: 11914: 11915: 21918: 11921: 11929: 11930: 11934: 11936: 11937: 11938: 21940: 11944: 11946: 11979: 119102026peak 1915 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Estate of Matthiessen175 Misc. 466 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1940)
  2. In re the Estate of Duryea14 N.E.2d 369 (N.Y. 1938)
  3. In re the Estate of Rogers70 N.E.2d 170 (N.Y. 1946) · Dissent
  4. In re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Slosson110 N.E. 166 (N.Y. 1915)
  5. In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Hoffman161 A.D. 836 (1914)
  6. Hancy v. Commissioner17 B.T.A. 464 (B.T.A. 1929)

Most recent

  1. Estate of Thorndike90 Cal. App. 3d 468 (1979)
  2. In re the Estate of Rogers70 N.E.2d 170 (N.Y. 1946) · Dissent
  3. In re the Estate of Grinnell183 Misc. 109 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1944)
  4. In re the Estate of Matthiessen175 Misc. 466 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1940)
  5. In re the Estate of Duryea14 N.E.2d 369 (N.Y. 1938)
  6. In re the Estate of Lathers167 Misc. 186 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list