TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Railroad Equipment Company v. Blair

Railroad Equipment Company v. . Mitchell S. Blair, as Receiver, Etc.

R.R. Equip. Co. v. Blair, 39 N.E. 962 (N.Y. 1895)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 12, 1895
Citations
39 N.E. 962145 N.Y. 6071895 N.Y. LEXIS 880
Cited by 14

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 609

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 610

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 611

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 612 ANDREWS, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.

All concur, except HAIGHT, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1896: 11897: 11898: 21899: 11903: 11907: 11910: 11912: 11914: 21929: 11959: 11961: 118962026peak 1898 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Chapman v. Moore91 P. 324 (Cal. 1907)
  2. International Firearms Co. v. Kingston Trust Co.160 N.E.2d 656 (N.Y. 1959)
  3. Mathews v. Hanson124 N.W. 1116 (N.D. 1910)
  4. Erisman v. Kerwin1899 OK 17, 56 P. 858
  5. Doctor Jack Pot Mining Co. v. Marsh216 F. 261 (D. Colo. 1914)
  6. Cramp v. Dady162 A.D. 321 (1914)

Most recent

  1. Mooney v. Shields196 Cal. App. 2d 165 (1961)
  2. International Firearms Co. v. Kingston Trust Co.160 N.E.2d 656 (N.Y. 1959)
  3. Cipperly v. Link135 Misc. 134 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1929)
  4. Cramp v. Dady162 A.D. 321 (1914)
  5. Doctor Jack Pot Mining Co. v. Marsh216 F. 261 (D. Colo. 1914)
  6. Simpson v. Pilpoul77 Misc. 108 (1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list