TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Crown Corset Company v. C. Ludwig Baumann Company

Crown Corset Company, Respondent, v. C. Ludwig Baumann & Company, Appellant

Crown Corset Co. v. C. Ludwig Baumann Co., 150 N.E. 574 (N.Y. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 12, 1926
Citations
150 N.E. 574241 N.Y. 6061926 N.Y. LEXIS 598

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman> JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1937: 11956: 119372026peak 1937 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Davidek v. Wyoming Investment Co.291 P.2d 1072 (Wyo. 1956)
  2. State ex rel. Reiman v. Kimmell10 N.E.2d 911 (Ind. 1937)

Most recent

  1. Davidek v. Wyoming Investment Co.291 P.2d 1072 (Wyo. 1956)
  2. State ex rel. Reiman v. Kimmell10 N.E.2d 911 (Ind. 1937)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list