TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Accounting of Bank of New York

In the Matter of the Accounting of Bank of New York, as Trustee Under the Will of Ella J. Hoagland, Deceased, Respondent. Elinor G. Clendenin Et Al., Appellants; Hopewell Society of Brooklyn Et Al., Respondents

In re the Accounting of Bank of N.Y., 79 N.E.2d 746 (N.Y. 1948)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 22, 1948
Citations
79 N.E.2d 746297 N.Y. 9201948 N.Y. LEXIS 1008
Cited by 8

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable o.ut of the fund; no opinion.

Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →
1950: 21952: 21960: 11961: 11970: 11979: 119502026peak 1950 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.339 U.S. 306 (1950)
  2. DiMauro v. Pavia492 F. Supp. 1051 (D. Conn. 1979)
  3. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Ackerman87 A.2d 47 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  4. In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.201 Misc. 1008 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1952)
  5. In re the Estate of Durland64 Misc. 2d 810 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1970)
  6. In re the Accounting of Bank of New York & Fifth Avenue Bank198 Misc. 395 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1950)

Most recent

  1. DiMauro v. Pavia492 F. Supp. 1051 (D. Conn. 1979)
  2. In re the Estate of Durland64 Misc. 2d 810 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1970)
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of Zumstine13 A.D.2d 780 (1961)
  4. In re the Accounting of Carpenter29 Misc. 2d 411 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1960)
  5. In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.201 Misc. 1008 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1952)
  6. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Ackerman87 A.2d 47 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list