TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Snook v. Sullivan

Helen J. Snook, as Administratrix With the Will Annexed of Harriet White, Deceased, Respondent, v. Lottie E. Sullivan, as Executrix of Robert F. Sullivan, Appellant, Impleaded With Another

Snook v. Sullivan, 60 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 7, 1901
Citations
60 N.E. 1120167 N.Y. 5365 Bedell 5361901 N.Y. LEXIS 1109
Cited by 6
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered August 9, 1900, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term and granting a new trial.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Landon and Cullen, JJ. Taking no part: Parker, Ch. J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1904: 11957: 11959: 21970: 11978: 119042026peak 1959 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Allen-West Commission Co. v. Grumbles129 F. 287 (8th Cir. 1904)
  2. Reoux v. Reoux3 A.D.2d 560 (1957)
  3. Howland v. Smith9 A.D.2d 197 (1959)
  4. Radin v. Opperman64 A.D.2d 820 (1978)
  5. In re the Estate of Bartel33 A.D.2d 987 (1970)
  6. Howland v. Smith16 Misc. 2d 894 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1959)

Most recent

  1. Radin v. Opperman64 A.D.2d 820 (1978)
  2. In re the Estate of Bartel33 A.D.2d 987 (1970)
  3. Howland v. Smith9 A.D.2d 197 (1959)
  4. Howland v. Smith16 Misc. 2d 894 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1959)
  5. Reoux v. Reoux3 A.D.2d 560 (1957)
  6. Allen-West Commission Co. v. Grumbles129 F. 287 (8th Cir. 1904)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list