Lamborn v. the Lake Shore Banking and Trust Company
Arthur H. Lamborn Et Al., Doing Business as Lamborn & Company, Appellants, v. the Lake Shore Banking and Trust Company, Respondent
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in the negative, second in the affirmative, third, fourth and fifth not answered; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, J.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(Java white sugar v. Java white granulated sugar)
Cited by 22 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals3
- Federal District Courts3
- State Highest Courts5
- State Appellate Courts6
- State Trial Courts5
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.
- Banco Espanol De Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, (Two Cases)
- Kingdom of Sweden v. New York Trust Co.
- Republic of Italy v. De Angelis
- Sztejn v. J. Henry Schroder Banking Corp.
- Courtaulds North America, Inc. v. North Carolina National Bank, a National Banking Association
Most recent
- Courtaulds North America, Inc. v. North Carolina National Bank, a National Banking Association
- Banco Espanol De Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, (Two Cases)
- Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. of New York v. Banco Del Pais, S. A.
- Republic of Italy v. De Angelis
- Kingdom of Sweden v. New York Trust Co.
- M. E. Schoen Corp. v. Bank of China
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.