TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Lubin

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathan Lubin, Appellant

People v. Lubin, 129 N.E. 924 (N.Y. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 7, 1920
Citations
129 N.E. 924229 N.Y. 6011920 N.Y. LEXIS 799
Cited by 6
Headnotes
Crimes — grand larceny in first degree — criminally receiving stolen property, second degree — second offenses —■ conviction affirmed.
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 16, 1920, which affirmed a judgment of the Bronx County Court rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crimes of grand larceny in the first degree and criminally receiving stolen property in the second degree, charged as second offenses.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Andrews and Elkus, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1940: 11960: 11962: 11963: 11969: 11970: 119402026peak 1940 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Genovese180 N.E.2d 419 (N.Y. 1962)
  2. People v. Rivera258 N.E.2d 699 (N.Y. 1970)
  3. People v. Sher248 N.E.2d 887 (N.Y. 1969)
  4. People ex rel. Totalis v. Craver174 Misc. 325 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1940)
  5. People v. Freistadt23 Misc. 2d 534 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)
  6. People v. Austin19 A.D.2d 674 (1963)

Most recent

  1. People v. Rivera258 N.E.2d 699 (N.Y. 1970)
  2. People v. Sher248 N.E.2d 887 (N.Y. 1969)
  3. People v. Austin19 A.D.2d 674 (1963)
  4. People v. Genovese180 N.E.2d 419 (N.Y. 1962)
  5. People v. Freistadt23 Misc. 2d 534 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)
  6. People ex rel. Totalis v. Craver174 Misc. 325 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1940)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list