TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Salotar v. F. Neuglass Co.

In the Matter of the Claim of Annie Salotar, Respondent, Against F. Neuglass & Co. Et Al., Appellants. State Industrial Commission, Respondent

Salotar v. F. Neuglass Co., 126 N.E. 922 (N.Y. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 20, 1920
Citations
126 N.E. 922228 N.Y. 5081920 N.Y. LEXIS 958
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 19, 1919, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant’s son died from the results of a fall from a stepladder he was using in the course of his employment. The state industrial commission made an award to the mother on the ground that she was a dependent based upon the actual earnings of the deceased. About one year thereafter the case was reopened, additional testimony taken and the award increased on the ground that the deceased, had he lived, would be earning more than at the time of his death.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order of Appellate Division and award of industrial commission modified so as to provide that increase in compensation shall not take effect prior to October 16, 1918, and so modified affirmed, with costs to appellants against the industrial commission; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting and voting for affirmance: Pound, J. Not voting: His cock, Ch. J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1921: 31923: 11929: 119212026peak 1921 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list