Salotar v. F. Neuglass Co.
In the Matter of the Claim of Annie Salotar, Respondent, Against F. Neuglass & Co. Et Al., Appellants. State Industrial Commission, Respondent
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order of Appellate Division and award of industrial commission modified so as to provide that increase in compensation shall not take effect prior to October 16, 1918, and so modified affirmed, with costs to appellants against the industrial commission; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting and voting for affirmance: Pound, J. Not voting: His cock, Ch. J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.