TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Plesch v. Banque Nationale De La Republique D'Haiti

Arpad Plesch Et Al., Respondents, v. Banque Nationale De La Republique D’Haiti, Appellant

Plesch v. Banque Nationale De La Republique D'Haiti, 81 N.E.2d 106 (N.Y. 1948)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 16, 1948
Judges
Loughran, Cli, Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye, Ftjld
Citations
81 N.E.2d 106298 N.Y. 573

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

At least as regards the securities that were delivered into the custody of the defendant and kept in safekeeping accounts maintained by it in New York, we agree with the conclusion of a majority of the Appellate Division that the plaintiffs have made a prima facie showing of a cause of action in conversion which accrued in this State and is sufficient to withstand a motion to vacate the warrant of attachment. Since the motion was not one to modify, but only to vacate the war *575 rant, we deem it unnecessary to determine whether the plaintiffs have made such a showing with respect to all the securities entrusted to the defendant’s custody, particularly those physically situated in Haiti at the time of the promulgation of the decrees of the Bepublic of Haiti on which the defendant relies. It is enough that as to a major portion of their claim we cannot say as matter of law on this record that the plaintiffs must ultimately be defeated (see American Reserve Ins. Co.

v. China Ins. Co., 297 N. Y. 322, 325 ).

At Special Term the defendant claimed immunity from suit and from attachment of its property as a sovereign instrumentality of the Republic of Haiti, but that claim is not urged oh this appeal.

The order should be afi&rmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.

Loughran, Cli. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Ftjld, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1952: 11953: 11955: 21956: 11962: 11964: 11965: 31966: 119522026peak 1965 · 3

Most recent

  1. Republic Of Iraq v. First National City Bank353 F.2d 47 (1st Cir. 1966)
  2. Republic of Iraq v. First National City Bank353 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1965)
  3. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.209 N.E.2d 68 (N.Y. 1965) · Concurrence
  4. Republic of Iraq v. First National City Bank241 F. Supp. 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)
  5. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino376 U.S. 398 (1964)
  6. City of Albany v. McMorran34 Misc. 2d 304 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1962)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Am. Reserve Ins. v. China Ins., 79 N.E.2d 425 (N.Y. 1948) 47

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list