Ditomasso v. Loverro, Rubel
Leo DiTomasso, Appellant and Respondent, v. Vito Loverro Et Al., Respondents, and Samuel Rubel Et Al., Respondents and Appellants
Opinion of the Court
On plaintiff’s appeal from order granting a new trial as to the defendants Loverro et al., order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff, appellant, on the stipulation, without costs.
On plaintiff’s appeal from judgment, judgment affirmed, without costs.
On defendants’ appeals, judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion. (See 276 N. Y. 610 , 681.)
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey/JJ.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(pro rata recovery awarded to plaintiff who brought a derivative action on behalf of a closely held corporation against defendants, who included all the other stockholders but one)
-
(directors liable for damages, in derivative action, “where they knew, or should have known, the contract” was in restraint of trade and thus illegal)
Cited by 14 cases
View all citing references →- Federal District Courts2
- Bankruptcy Courts1
- State Highest Courts2
- State Appellate Courts4
- State Trial Courts5
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.