TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fulton Bag Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Frankel

Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, Inc., Appellant, v. Joseph Frankel Et Al., Copartners Under the Firm Name of Frankel Brothers, Respondents

Fulton Bag Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Frankel, 138 N.E. 454 (N.Y. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 21, 1922
Citations
138 N.E. 454234 N.Y. 5801922 N.Y. LEXIS 765

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1924: 11933: 119242026peak 1924 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dery v. Blate209 A.D. 467 (1924)
  2. Bisbee Linseed Co. v. Paragon Paint & Varnish Corp.66 F.2d 595 (2d Cir. 1933)

Most recent

  1. Bisbee Linseed Co. v. Paragon Paint & Varnish Corp.66 F.2d 595 (2d Cir. 1933)
  2. Dery v. Blate209 A.D. 467 (1924)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list