TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Hendricks

In the Matter of the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Harmon Hendricks, Deceased. the Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; Blanche Hendricks, Individually and as Executrix of Harmon Hendricks, Deceased, Respondent

In re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Hendricks, 108 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 16, 1915
Citations
108 N.E. 1095214 N.Y. 6631915 N.Y. LEXIS 1365
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 1Y, 1914, which reversed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court assessing a transfer tax upon the estate of Harmon Hendricks, deceased.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Miller, JJ. Not sitting: Cardozo, J. Absent: Seabury, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1921: 11923: 11924: 11934: 11984: 119212026peak 1921 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Estate of Valentine122 Misc. 486 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1924)
  2. Elyachar v. Gerel Corp.583 F. Supp. 907 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)
  3. In re the Appraisal of the Property of the Estate of Wadsworth198 A.D. 483 (1921)
  4. In re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Miller204 A.D. 418 (1923)
  5. Norris v. United States7 F. Supp. 415 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)

Most recent

  1. Elyachar v. Gerel Corp.583 F. Supp. 907 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)
  2. Norris v. United States7 F. Supp. 415 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)
  3. In re the Estate of Valentine122 Misc. 486 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1924)
  4. In re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Miller204 A.D. 418 (1923)
  5. In re the Appraisal of the Property of the Estate of Wadsworth198 A.D. 483 (1921)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list