TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brinkerhoff v. Green

William Brinkerhoff, as Executor and Trustee Under the Will of George J. Seabury, Deceased, Respondent, v. Norman S. Green Et Al., Appellants

Brinkerhoff v. Green, 95 N.E. 1123 (N.Y. 1911)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 3, 1911
Citations
95 N.E. 1123201 N.Y. 5591911 N.Y. LEXIS 1329
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 13,1910, which affirmed a judgment of Special Term construing the will of George J. Seahury, deceased.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs to both parties, payable out the estate; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook and Chase, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1913: 11916: 11917: 21920: 21922: 11929: 11934: 11954: 119132026peak 1917 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Estate of Douglass120 Misc. 193 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1922)
  2. In re the Accounting of Silsby128 N.E. 212 (N.Y. 1920)
  3. In re Hornidge135 Misc. 170 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1929)
  4. In re the Probate of Will of Hitchcock118 N.E. 220 (N.Y. 1917)
  5. In re the Accounting of Heller120 N.E.2d 688 (N.Y. 1954)
  6. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Berry154 A.D. 509 (1913)

Most recent

  1. In re the Accounting of Heller120 N.E.2d 688 (N.Y. 1954)
  2. In re the Estate of Innerfield153 Misc. 706 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1934)
  3. In re Hornidge135 Misc. 170 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1929)
  4. In re the Estate of Douglass120 Misc. 193 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1922)
  5. Woolley v. Hutchins114 Misc. 11 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1920)
  6. In re the Accounting of Silsby128 N.E. 212 (N.Y. 1920)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list