TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Clyde v. Wendell

The People of the State of New York Ex Rel. Emeline F. Clyde, Appellant, v. James A. Wendell, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent

People ex rel. Clyde v. Wendell, 134 N.E. 567 (N.Y. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 6, 1921
Citations
134 N.E. 567232 N.Y. 5501921 N.Y. LEXIS 581
Headnotes
Tax — personal income tax — income from mortgages on which mortgage tax has been paid and income from secured debts upon which secured debt tax has been paid properly included in assessing personal income tax.
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 5, 1921, which confirmed on certiorari a determination of the state comptroller assessing an additional income tax upon the relator for the year 1919. The relator in making the return of her income for the taxable year 1919 did not include in such income certain interest received from mortgage bonds, with respect to which the mortgage recording tax had been paid as prescribed by article XI of the Tax Law, commonly known as the Mortgage Recording Tax Law, the amount of income thus received and not originally returned being $26,458.34. The relator had likewise received, but did not originally return, income in the sum of $32,478.29, as interest upon obligations defined as “ secured debts ” by the Tax Law, as amended by chapter 802 of the Laws of 1911, and as to which the secured debt tax, so called, had duly been paid in accordance with that chapter. Subsequently the relator was notified by the state comptroller that the income from both mortgages and secured debts was taxable and was required to pay the additional tax with respect to both the items of income above referred to.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound; McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1922: 11937: 219222026peak 1937 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list