TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Manhattan Railway Company v. O'Sullivan

In the Matter of the Application of the Manhattan Railway Company Et Al., Appellants, v. Eugene O’Sullivan Et Al., Respondents

Manhattan Ry. Co. v. O'Sullivan, 44 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1896)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 20, 1896
Citations
44 N.E. 1125150 N.Y. 5691896 N.Y. LEXIS 1022
Summary
Appeal from order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 23, 1896, which reversed an order of Special Term setting aside the report of commissioners of appraisal in condemnation proceedings and confirmed the report.]

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, on opinion below, with costs.

All concur, except O’Bbien, J., taking no part.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1903: 21908: 21912: 11927: 11932: 11962: 119032026peak 1903 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Guilford v. Bradbury83 N.Y.S. 312 (1903)
  2. Great Neck Water Authority v. Citizens Water Supply Co.187 N.E.2d 786 (N.Y. 1962)
  3. In re Charges against Skinkle221 A.D. 682 (1927)
  4. In re the City of New York152 A.D. 422 (1912)
  5. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Stuyvesant126 A.D. 848 (1908)
  6. Claim of Johns v. Village of Salamanca129 A.D. 717 (1908)

Most recent

  1. Great Neck Water Authority v. Citizens Water Supply Co.187 N.E.2d 786 (N.Y. 1962)
  2. In re City of New York234 A.D. 399 (1932)
  3. In re Charges against Skinkle221 A.D. 682 (1927)
  4. In re the City of New York152 A.D. 422 (1912)
  5. Claim of Johns v. Village of Salamanca129 A.D. 717 (1908)
  6. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Stuyvesant126 A.D. 848 (1908)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list