TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Post v. Thomas

Edwin M. Post Et Al., Appellants, v. Edward R. Thomas Et Al., Respondents

Post v. Thomas, 116 N.E. 1070 (N.Y. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 17, 1917
Citations
116 N.E. 1070220 N.Y. 7351917 N.Y. LEXIS 1206
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 31, 1914,- affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee in an an action to recover for an alleged breach by the defendants of a contract whereby they undertook and assumed to sell and transfer to the plaintiffs, partners in the the brokerage business under the firm name of Post & Co., the business theretofore conducted as a brokerage, in the city of New York, under the firm name of Thomas & Thomas, together with the good will of that business, for the sum of $24,000 in cash paid them by the plaintiffs and the assumption by the plaintiffs of the accounts to be transferred with said business, and - with á warranty by the defendants that such business should be worth in commissions to the plaintiffs at least $24,000 per year. The defendants answered separately, admitting the contract in some particulars and denying in others, and alleging that the contract was comprised in a written instrument annexed to their answers, and denying any breach or damage. The defendant Orlando F. Thomas also set up, in his own behalf, an allegation of settlement and discharge of all his liability.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Oh. J., Chase, Hogan, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list