Stallo v. Jones
Edmund K. Stallo, Appellant, v. Arthur H. Jones, Respondent
Stallo v. Jones, 103 N.E. 164 (N.Y. 1913)
Summary
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 9, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term in an action to vacate a judgment.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the questions involved were academic and could result in no effectual judgment and that the appeal was frivolous.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, on the ground that the appeal is frivolous.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.