TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Guida v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

In the Matter of the Claim of Edward Guida, Against Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Respondent. the State Industrial Commission, Appellant

Guida v. Pa. R.R. Co., 121 N.E. 871 (N.Y. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 26, 1918
Citations
121 N.E. 871224 N.Y. 7121918 N.Y. LEXIS 1120
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third- judicial department, entered July 1, 1918, reversing an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law and dismissing the claim. The award was for funeral expenses on account of the death of Michael Panella, who died as a result of burns received by him while engaged in cleaning a boiler at the Pennsylvania Railroad Company’s power house at Long Island City, which supplies electric current for the Long Island Railroad Company and for the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. The trains operated by the Long Island Railroad Company, which derive their motive power from this power house, run entirely within the state of New York, but are engaged indiscriminately in both interstate and intrastate commerce. The trains of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, which are operated through current generated from this power house, run from the Long Island City yards in the state of New York to Manhattan transfer in the state of New Jersey. The defendant contended that its employee was engaged in interstate commerce at the time of the accident.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Hogan and Crane, JJ. _

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1919: 11922: 11930: 11931: 11935: 119192026peak 1919 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Claim of Wise v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.230 A.D. 609 (1930)
  2. Hiser v. Davis137 N.E. 596 (N.Y. 1922)
  3. Erie R. v. Szary259 F. 178 (2d Cir. 1919)
  4. Bezue v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad176 N.E. 828 (N.Y. 1931)
  5. Sullivan v. New York, N. H. & H. R.74 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1935)

Most recent

  1. Sullivan v. New York, N. H. & H. R.74 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1935)
  2. Bezue v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad176 N.E. 828 (N.Y. 1931)
  3. Claim of Wise v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.230 A.D. 609 (1930)
  4. Hiser v. Davis137 N.E. 596 (N.Y. 1922)
  5. Erie R. v. Szary259 F. 178 (2d Cir. 1919)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list