Cutting v. Stokes
W. Bayard Cutting, Et Al., Respondents, v. William E. D. Stokes, Impleaded, Etc., Appellant
Cutting v. Stokes, 42 N.E. 722 (N.Y. 1895)
Summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made October 13,1893, Avhich affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Bartlett, J., dissenting.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.