Kinner v. Whipple
Maggie Kinner, Appellant, v. Charles R. Whipple Et Al., Respondents
Kinner v. Whipple, 92 N.E. 1088 (N.Y. 1910)
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 30, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Cochrane, J., below.
Concur: Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett and IIiscock, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray and Chase, J J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.