TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lynott v. Great Lakes Transit Corporation

Catherine Lynott, as Administratrix of the Estate of Peter Lynott, Deceased, Respondent, v. Great Lakes Transit Corporation, Appellant

Lynott v. Great Lakes Transit Corp., 138 N.E. 473 (N.Y. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 15, 1922
Citations
138 N.E. 473234 N.Y. 6261922 N.Y. LEXIS 825
Headnotes
Negligence — master and servant — jurisdiction — action to recover for death of employee on vessel occasioned through alleged negligence of master — jurisdiction of state courts — assumption of risk.
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered August 11, 1922, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant, his employer. Plaintiff’s intestate, a fireman on the steamship Octorara, left the vessel while it was docked at the city of Buffalo, and while returning to the vessel and attempting to pass over a gangplank provided by the defendant for his use, fell from said plank and was drowned. Defendant contended: First, that this action was not within the jurisdiction of the court because of the provisions of section 33, amending section 20, of the Merchant Marine Act of the United States, passed and effective June 5, 1920, and second, that in any event the deceased assumed the risks which resulted in his death, and, therefore, the plaintiff cannot recover.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 28 cases

View all citing references →
1923: 21924: 21926: 31927: 31929: 11931: 11932: 41933: 11934: 11937: 11938: 21939: 11940: 11941: 11948: 11957: 11958: 11961: 119232026peak 1932 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Sullivan v. Tazwell262 P. 220 (Or. 1927)
  2. Rodrigues v. Transmarine Corp.216 A.D. 337 (1926)
  3. Engel v. Davenport271 U.S. 33 (1926)
  4. Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.287 U.S. 278 (1932)
  5. Moore-M v. Richardson295 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1961)
  6. Patrone v. M. P. Howlett, Inc.143 N.E. 232 (N.Y. 1924)

Most recent

  1. Moore-M v. Richardson295 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1961)
  2. In re the Estate of Vogel12 Misc. 2d 237 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1958)
  3. In re the Accounting of Boyd11 Misc. 2d 33 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1957)
  4. In re the Accounting of Yocom193 Misc. 340 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1948)
  5. Otis v. State176 Misc. 389 (1941)
  6. Fiolat v. Minnesota-Atlantic Transit Co.31 F. Supp. 219 (D. Minnesota 1940)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list