TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Administration of the Estate of Swales

In the Matter of the Administration of the Estate of William H. Swales, Deceased. Mary E. Swales, Appellant; Joseph G. Swales, as Administrator, Etc., Respondent

In re the Admin. of the Estate of Swales, 65 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 25, 1902
Citations
65 N.E. 1122172 N.Y. 65110 Bedell 6511902 N.Y. LEXIS 797
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 30, 1901, which reversed a decree of the Wayne County Surrogate’s Court declaring the petitioner entitled to administer the estate of William E. Swales, deceased, and revoking letters of administration theretofore issued to Joseph' G. Swales and denied the petition.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Cullen, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 25 cases

View all citing references →
1903: 11908: 11912: 11915: 11916: 21917: 21919: 11920: 11922: 31927: 11937: 11938: 11940: 11943: 21945: 11947: 11949: 11950: 21992: 119032026peak 1922 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hamm v. Hamm204 S.W.2d 113 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1947)
  2. Bledsoe v. Seaman95 P. 576 (Kan. 1908)
  3. Krause v. Krause26 N.E.2d 290 (N.Y. 1940) · Dissent
  4. Starbuck v. Starbuck66 N.E. 193 (N.Y. 1903)
  5. In re the Estate of Holmes52 N.E.2d 424 (N.Y. 1943) · Dissent
  6. Kaufman v. Kaufman177 A.D. 162 (1917)

Most recent

  1. Peterson v. Goldberg180 A.D.2d 260 (1992)
  2. In re the Estate of Kittinger199 Misc. 377 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1950)
  3. In re the Accounting of Rathscheck90 N.E.2d 887 (N.Y. 1950) · Dissent
  4. In re Tamke's Estate204 P.2d 526 (Wash. 1949)
  5. Hamm v. Hamm204 S.W.2d 113 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1947)
  6. Romanski's Estate53 Pa. D. & C. 531 (1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list