TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Otto v. Steinhilber

In the Matter of Mignon M. Otto Et Al., Appellants, Against Albert Steinhilber Et Al., Constituting the Board of Appeals of the Village of Lynbrook, Respondent. Michael Garramone, Intervener, Respondent

Otto v. Steinhilber, 26 N.E.2d 811 (N.Y. 1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 5, 1940
Citations
26 N.E.2d 811282 N.Y. 6811940 N.Y. LEXIS 1483

Opinion of the Court

Motion for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 282 N. Y. 71 .)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 21970: 11977: 11979: 11981: 11982: 219682026peak 1968 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Fasani v. Rappaport30 A.D.2d 588 (1968)
  2. Carroll v. Ingram59 A.D.2d 85 (1977)
  3. Everhart v. Johnston30 A.D.2d 608 (1968)
  4. Stanley Park, Inc. v. Donovan34 A.D.2d 690 (1970)
  5. Baker v. Board of Zoning Appeals67 A.D.2d 1071 (1979)
  6. Blumberg v. Siegel87 A.D.2d 650 (1982)

Most recent

  1. Goldstein v. Board of Zoning Appeals113 Misc. 2d 756 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1982)
  2. Blumberg v. Siegel87 A.D.2d 650 (1982)
  3. C.C.L.S., Inc. v. Baruch79 A.D.2d 1002 (1981)
  4. Baker v. Board of Zoning Appeals67 A.D.2d 1071 (1979)
  5. Carroll v. Ingram59 A.D.2d 85 (1977)
  6. Stanley Park, Inc. v. Donovan34 A.D.2d 690 (1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Otto v. Steinhilber, 24 N.E.2d 851 (N.Y. 1939) 264

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list