United States v. Malveaux
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael MALVEAUX, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
* Michael Malveaux appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Malveaux argues that the district court erred in applying the enhancement provision found in U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) of the Sentencing Guidelines, because there was no evidence that Malveaux possessed a firearm in connection with another felony offense. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law of this circuit, we hold that the district court did not err, as a matter of law, in concluding that the firearm possession was “in connection with” the drug possession.
See United States v. Armstead, 114 F.3d 504, 512 (5th Cir.1997);
United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190, 1193, 1199-1200 (5th Cir.1994). Accordingly, the district court correctly applied U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5), and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.