TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People, ex rel. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Chapin

The People, Ex Rel. the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant, v. Alfred C. Chapin, Comptroller, Etc., Respondent

People, ex rel. Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y of the United States v. Chapin, 8 N.E. 363 (N.Y. 1886)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 5, 1886
Judges
Danforth
Citations
8 N.E. 363103 N.Y. 63558 Sickels 6351886 N.Y. LEXIS 1105
Headnotes
Where the State comptroller has acted upon an application to vacate a tax sale, and has denied the same, he cannot be required by mandamus to reach a different conclusion. The matter is for his determination and although his decision be erroneous it cannot be thus reviewed.
Summary
This was an application by relator, who claimed as mortgagee, for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the State comptroller to vacate a tax sale and a conveyance under it because of alleged irregularities. The comptroller, upon application made to him to cancel the sale, denied the same. The following is the mem. of opinion : “ The comptroller acted upon the papers presented to him and refused the application upon the ground that the sales were regular. The matter was for his determination, and we agree with the Supreme Court in the opinion that he cannot, by mamdamus, be required to reach a different conclusion. (How-land v. Eldredge, 43 1ST. T. 457.) . “ The order should be affirmed, with costs.”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Danforth

Danforth, J., reads mem.

for affirmance.

All concur.

Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1887: 11889: 31893: 11895: 11896: 11897: 11915: 118872026peak 1889 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People ex rel. Lockwood v. Trustees of the Saratoga Springs61 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 16 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1889)
  2. Chittenden v. Wurster46 N.E. 857 (N.Y. 1897) · Dissent
  3. People ex rel. Harris v. Commissioners of the Land Office43 N.E. 418 (N.Y. 1896)
  4. The People ex rel. Millard v. Chapin10 N.E. 141 (N.Y. 1887)
  5. People ex rel. Hall v. Village of Little Falls8 N.Y.S. 512 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1889)
  6. State ex rel. Osborn v. Jennings108 N.E. 513 (Ind. 1915)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Osborn v. Jennings108 N.E. 513 (Ind. 1915)
  2. Chittenden v. Wurster46 N.E. 857 (N.Y. 1897) · Dissent
  3. People ex rel. Harris v. Commissioners of the Land Office43 N.E. 418 (N.Y. 1896)
  4. In re Harris36 N.Y.S. 29 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1895)
  5. Hennessey v. Volkening22 N.Y.S. 528 (1893)
  6. People ex rel. Hall v. President & Board of Trustees4 Silv. Sup. 538 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1889)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list