TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Goldberg v. Markowitz

Manuel Goldberg, as Administrator of the Estate of Nathan M. Goldberg, Deceased, Respondent, v. Mary Markowitz Et Al., Appellants

Goldberg v. Markowitz, 75 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1905)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 3, 1905
Citations
75 N.E. 1129182 N.Y. 5401905 N.Y. LEXIS 1017
Summary
Appeal from a judgment, entered May 17, 1904, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court and directing judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11966: 119102026peak 1910 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Coakley v. Rickard136 A.D. 489 (1910)
  2. Kiamesha Concord, Inc. v. Pullman52 Misc. 2d 210 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Kiamesha Concord, Inc. v. Pullman52 Misc. 2d 210 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1966)
  2. Coakley v. Rickard136 A.D. 489 (1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list