TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Accounting of the Executors of Appell

In the Matter of the Accounting of the Executors of Jacob Appell, Deceased. Amanda A. Evans, Individually and as Executrix of and Trustee Under the Will of Jacob Appell, Deceased, Et Al., Appellants; Albert J. Appell, Individually and as Executor of Jacob Appell, Deceased, Et Al., Respondents

In re the Accounting of the Executors of Appell, 138 N.E. 462 (N.Y. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 28, 1922
Citations
138 N.E. 462234 N.Y. 6001922 N.Y. LEXIS 788
Headnotes
Executors and administrators — accounting — when taxes chargeable to income —■ when cost of mausoleum not chargeable against estate — allowance for counsel fees — payments on account of mortgages’ correctly charged to principal.
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered' June 27, 1922, which modified and affirmed as modified a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court settling the account of Amanda A. Evans, as executrix of and trustee under the will of Jacob Appell, deceased. The Appellate Division held that taxes not fixed in amount at the time of the death of testator were not a charge against the estate which should be paid out of capital but were a charge against the income of the year in which they were payable; that the cost of an elaborate mausoleum was not properly chargeable against the estate; that counsel fees were allowable only to the extent that their value was proved, and that payments or account of mortgages were correctly charged to principal.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 21938: 21939: 11940: 11942: 11947: 11949: 119302026peak 1930 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Burchell v. Helvering115 F.2d 681 (2d Cir. 1940)
  2. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Adda, Inc.171 F.2d 367 (2d Cir. 1949)
  3. MacGregor v. Johnson-Cowdin-Emmerich, Inc.39 F.2d 574 (2d Cir. 1930)
  4. People ex rel. Four Park Avenue Corp. v. Lilly265 A.D. 68 (1942)
  5. Adda, Inc. v. Commissioner9 T.C. 199 (Tax Ct. 1947)
  6. In re the Estate of Pinkney170 Misc. 645 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)

Most recent

  1. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Adda, Inc.171 F.2d 367 (2d Cir. 1949)
  2. Adda, Inc. v. Commissioner9 T.C. 199 (Tax Ct. 1947)
  3. People ex rel. Four Park Avenue Corp. v. Lilly265 A.D. 68 (1942)
  4. Burchell v. Helvering115 F.2d 681 (2d Cir. 1940)
  5. In re the Estate of Hackert171 Misc. 139 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1939)
  6. In re the Estate of Pinkney170 Misc. 645 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list