Barath v. Arnold Paint Company
In the Matter of the Claim of Sarah Barath Et Al., Respondents, Against Arnold Paint Company Et Al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent
Barath v. Arnold Paint Co., 144 N.E. 918 (N.Y. 1924)
Opinion of the Court
*626 Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.