Smith v. Graham
George H. Smith Et Al., Respondents, v. Corden T. Graham, Appellant
Smith v. Graham, 116 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1917)
Summary
Motion for re-argument. (See 217 N. Y. 655.)
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Motion granted, the re-argument to be limited to the question whether the judgment should be modified by pro *499 viding in substance that nothing therein contained shall prohibit the defendant from removing the addition from the lands described in the deed of. May 2, 1905, and erecting or remodeling the addition so as to make it a dwelling as defined in the deed of August 9, 1899.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.