TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Accounting of Wright

In the Matter of the Accounting of Margaret M. Wright, as Testamentary Trustee Under the Will of James Nisbet, Deceased, Appellant. Margaret E. Callen, Respondent

In re the Accounting of Wright, 93 N.E. 1135 (N.Y. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 18, 1910
Citations
93 N.E. 1135199 N.Y. 5691910 N.Y. LEXIS 1353
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered J une 3, 1910, which reversed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of the trustee herein and directed the entry of a decree in accordance with its opinion. Also, motion to dismiss said appeal upon the grounds, That the said Appellate Division having unanimously reversed the decree of the Surrogate’s Court of New York county upon the law and the facts, and having itself determined the facts pursuant to section 2586 of the Code of Civil Procedure, this court has no jurisdiction to review the order of June 3, 1910, and the decree entered thereon; and that the order of June 24, 1910, appealed from, which denied the motion of Margaret M. Wright, as trustee, for an order remitting this proceeding to the Surrogate’s Court for a new trial or rehearing, was a discretion ary order of said Appellate Division made pursuant to section 2587 of the Code of Civil Procedure and not appealable to this court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Decree of Appellate Division affirmed, with costs, and motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen,Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, IIiscooic and Chase, JJ..

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list