TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Guardian Trust Company of New York v. Straus

Guardian Trust Company of New York, Respondent, v. Rosa W. Straus, Individually and as Executrix of Louis Straus, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded With Others

Guardian Trust Co. of N.Y. v. Straus, 95 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1911)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 28, 1911
Citations
95 N.E. 1129201 N.Y. 5461911 N.Y. LEXIS 1320
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 17, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to have life insurance of Louis Straus, deceased, applied to the payment of his debts.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Haight,' J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 11923: 11928: 21929: 319142026peak 1929 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Chase National Bank v. United States278 U.S. 327 (1929)
  2. Chatham Phenix National Bank v. Crosney167 N.E. 217 (N.Y. 1929)
  3. Grems v. Traver87 Misc. 644 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1914)
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Commissioner16 B.T.A. 314 (B.T.A. 1929)
  5. Chatham Phenix National Bank & Trust Co. v. Crosney224 A.D. 58 (1928)
  6. In re the Estate of Davis120 Misc. 457 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1923)

Most recent

  1. Chatham Phenix National Bank v. Crosney167 N.E. 217 (N.Y. 1929)
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Commissioner16 B.T.A. 314 (B.T.A. 1929)
  3. Chase National Bank v. United States278 U.S. 327 (1929)
  4. Chatham Phenix National Bank & Trust Co. v. Crosney224 A.D. 58 (1928)
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of Accounts of Marine Trust Co.131 Misc. 806 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1928)
  6. In re the Estate of Davis120 Misc. 457 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list