TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McNamara v. New York State Railways

In the Matter of the Claim of J. J. McNamara, Respondent, Against New York State Railways, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent

McNamara v. N.Y. State Railways, 135 N.E. 968 (N.Y. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: aff'd sub nom. N.Y. State Railways v. Shuler, 265 U.S. 379 (1924). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 31, 1922
Citations
135 N.E. 968233 N.Y. 6811922 N.Y. LEXIS 1105
Headnotes
Workmen’s Compensation Law — constitutional law — award to state treasurer —■ contention that to compel payment will contravene Federal Constitution overruled.
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 16, 1922, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial board made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. An employee of appellant was killed in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The state industrial board made an award of $100 to the state treasurer pursuant to subdivision 7 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and a further award of $900 to the state treasurer pursuant to subdivision 8 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Appellant contended that the award was unfair and unreasonable and in the nature of a tax and that to compel payment will deprive appellant of its property without due process of law and deny to it equal protection of the law in contravention of section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1922: 11924: 11928: 11929: 11966: 119222026peak 1922 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list