Rutherfurd Realty Company v. Cook
Rutherfurd Realty Company, Respondent, v. Willet F. Cook, Appellant, Impleaded With Another
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The findings of fact in the decision of the court have been unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.
Such findings do not show that the personal obligation of the defendant Cook was assigned to the plaintiff. The other questions discussed are not raised by such findings. The judgment should be reversed and'a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless the plaintiff within twenty days consents to amend the judgment, by striking therefrom that part thereof directing that if the proceeds of the sale of *556 the real property therein described be insufficient to pay the amount due to the plaintiff, with interest and costs, that the defendant Cook pay the same to the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff have execution therefor, in which case the judgment as so amended is affirmed, without costs to either party in this court.
Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoooic and Chase, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.