TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Tiedemann v. Tiedemann

James Tiedemann, Respondent, v. Maria Tiedemann, Defendant, and William Fisher Et Al., Appellants

Tiedemann v. Tiedemann, 142 N.E. 273 (N.Y. 1923)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 8, 1923
Judges
Andrews, Cardozo, Crane, Hiscock, Hogan, McLaughlin, Pound
Citations
142 N.E. 273236 N.Y. 5341923 N.Y. LEXIS 954

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: Cardozo, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 11928: 11930: 11946: 11949: 11951: 11956: 11967: 119252026peak 1925 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Buszozak v. Wolo125 Misc. 546 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1925)
  2. Palumbo v. Palumbo55 Misc. 2d 264 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1967)
  3. Fellner v. Marino4 Misc. 2d 16 (1956)
  4. Valenti v. Valenti279 A.D. 677 (1951)
  5. Bartos v. Bartos138 Misc. 117 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1930)
  6. Edelman v. Edelman225 A.D. 771 (1928)

Most recent

  1. Palumbo v. Palumbo55 Misc. 2d 264 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1967)
  2. Fellner v. Marino4 Misc. 2d 16 (1956)
  3. Valenti v. Valenti279 A.D. 677 (1951)
  4. Kalman v. Kalman275 A.D.2d 715 (1949)
  5. Chapman v. Chapman270 A.D. 895 (1946)
  6. Bartos v. Bartos138 Misc. 117 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list