Sitzler v. Lathers, O'Gorman
Marguerite Sitzler, Respondent, v. Richard Lathers, Jr., Et Al., Defendants, and Richard O’Gorman, Appellant. David Miller, Respondent, v. Richard Lathers, Jr., Et Al., Defendants, and Richard O'Gorman, Appellant
Sitzler v. Lathers, 170 N.E. 139 (N.Y. 1929)
Opinion of the Court
*552 In each action judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that by reason of the use of the premises the passage to the fire escape was not free and unobstructed; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.