Cowans v. Ticonderoga Pulp and Paper Company
Percy P. Cowans Et Al., Respondents, v. Ticonderoga Pulp and Paper Company, Appellant
Cowans v. Ticonderoga Pulp & Paper Co., 159 N.E. 669 (N.Y. 1927)
Opinion of the Court
*604 Judgment. affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Van Kirk, J., below.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman and O’Brien, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(describing New York as “generous” in the recognition of the judgments of foreign nations)
-
(New York’s policy of enforcing foreign judgments applies strongly in marital actions)
Cited by 22 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals3
- Federal District Courts7
- Military Courts1
- State Highest Courts2
- State Appellate Courts2
- State Trial Courts3
- State Specialty Courts4
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.