TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Estate of Ashheim

In the Matter of the Estate of Solomon W. Ashheim, Deceased. Aaron Cohn, as Executor, Appellant; Saul W. Wolfenstein Et Al., Respondents

In re the Estate of Ashheim, 78 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 21, 1906
Citations
78 N.E. 1099185 N.Y. 60923 Bedell 6091906 N.Y. LEXIS 1060
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 14, 1906, which affirmed an order of' the New York County Surrogate’s Court directing the appellant herein to file his account as executor of Solomon W. Ashheim, deceased. The following questions were certified: “First. Is an executor who has duly qualified and received assets of his testator’s estate, for which he has never accounted, so far a trustee as to bring him within the rule that the Statute of Limitations does not commence to run in favor of a trustee, against one otherwise entitled to an account, until such trustee has repudiated his trust? “ Second. Where a third party is created by will a trustee, for a term not yet expired, of personal property, of which, as assets of his testator’s estate, the executor of such will has taken possession, but has not delivered the same to the trustee or accounted therefor, is the lapse of over twenty years from the issuance of letters testamentary a bar to a proceeding to compel such executor to account, by one interested in said trust as a' contingent remainderman not yet entitled to receive any benefit therefrom ? ”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. First question certified answered in the affirmative; second, in the negative.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 26 cases

View all citing references →
1907: 11908: 11910: 11911: 11913: 11914: 11915: 41931: 11939: 21940: 11942: 21950: 11963: 11966: 11971: 11972: 11990: 11991: 11993: 12006: 12013: 119072026peak 1915 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Estate of Barabash286 N.E.2d 268 (N.Y. 1972)
  2. Mitchell v. Mitchell170 A.D. 452 (1915)
  3. In re the Estate of Behr191 A.D.2d 431 (1993)
  4. In re the Estate of Jacobs257 A.D. 28 (1939)
  5. In re the Estate of Zilkha174 A.D.2d 331 (1991)
  6. In re the Estate of Beard141 Misc. 888 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1931)

Most recent

  1. Access Point Medical, LLC v. Mandell106 A.D.3d 40 (2013)
  2. In re of a Trust Established By Singer12 Misc. 3d 621 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2006)
  3. In re the Estate of Behr191 A.D.2d 431 (1993)
  4. In re the Estate of Zilkha174 A.D.2d 331 (1991)
  5. In re the Estate of Seaman146 Misc. 2d 563 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1990)
  6. In re the Estate of Barabash286 N.E.2d 268 (N.Y. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list