Dalzell v. Long Island Railroad Company
Rudolph C. Dalzell, Respondent, v. the Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant
Dalzell v. Long Island R.R. Co., 23 N.E. 1144 (N.Y. 1890)
Headnotes
Where, upon inspection of the record filed in this court, in an action tried by a jury, it appears that tho case presents no question of law that can be reviewed, the appeal will be dismissed on motion.
Summary
Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
“ The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff for $10,000. A motion for a new trial was denied at the circuit, and the judgment has been affirmed by the General Term in the second department, and the defendant has appealed to this court.
“We have looked into the record and find that no exception was taken at the trial. It is certainly clear that no questions for review are here presented. When upon an inspection of the record, filed in this court, it appears that the case does not present any question of law that can be reviewed, the appeal ought to be dismissed.
“ The appeal in this case should be dismissed, with costs.”
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
O’Brien, J.
reads mem.
for granting motion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.