Quaid v. Ratkowsky
Hopeton D. A. Quaid Et Al., Respondents, v. Bernard Ratkowsky, Appellant
Quaid v. Ratkowsky, 121 N.E. 885 (N.Y. 1918)
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 31, 1918, which reversed an order of Special Term, striking this case from the Special Term calendar and sending it to the Trial Term as an action at law triable by a jury. The action was against the individual owner of practically all the shares of stock of a corporation to compel the payment of an unsatisfied judgment obtained against the corporation. The Appellate Division held that the action was properly brought and was maintainable in equity. The following question was certified: “Do the pleadings and proof make out any cause of action in equity? ”
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 25 cases
View all citing references →- Federal District Courts1
- State Highest Courts2
- State Appellate Courts9
- State Trial Courts8
- State Specialty Courts5
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.