Bagdalik v. Flexlume Corp., State Ins. Fund
In the Matter of the Claim of Marie v. Bagdalik, Respondent, Against Flexlume Corporation, Employer, and State Insurance Fund, Appellant
Bagdalik v. Flexlume Corp., 24 N.E.2d 499 (N.Y. 1939)
Opinion of the Court
Order reversed and claim dismissed, with costs in all courts. The employee’s work in Chicago makes applicable the rule laid down in Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.
( 252 N. Y. 394 ). No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.