TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Nash v. the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.

George E. Nash, as Administrator, Etc., Respondent, v. the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant

Nash v. the N.Y. Cent. & Hudson River Rd. Co., 22 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1889)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 29, 1889
Citations
22 N.E. 1128117 N.Y. 6281889 N.Y. LEXIS 1482
Summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term .of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made May 14, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Gray, J., not voting.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1909: 11917: 119092026peak 1909 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Engleman's Adm'r122 S.W. 833 (Ky. Ct. App. 1909)
  2. Nucci v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.169 P. 273 (Colo. 1917) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. Nucci v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.169 P. 273 (Colo. 1917) · Dissent
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Engleman's Adm'r122 S.W. 833 (Ky. Ct. App. 1909)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list