TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gallagher v. Gallagher

Patrick Gallagher, Respondent, v. Mary Gallagher, Appellant

Gallagher v. Gallagher, 96 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1911)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 30, 1911
Citations
96 N.E. 1115202 N.Y. 5721911 N.Y. LEXIS 1141
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 29, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of an alleged agreement to convey real property.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 19 cases

View all citing references →
1911: 11912: 21915: 11916: 11921: 11923: 11928: 11929: 31932: 11933: 11935: 21936: 11939: 11949: 11950: 119112026peak 1929 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hanscom v. Irwin208 P.2d 330 (Or. 1949)
  2. Sinclair v. Purdy139 N.E. 255 (N.Y. 1923)
  3. Foreman v. Foreman167 N.E. 428 (N.Y. 1929)
  4. Fraw Realty Co. v. Natanson185 N.E. 679 (N.Y. 1933)
  5. Weigert v. Schlesinger150 A.D. 765 (1912)
  6. In re the Estate of Poth155 Misc. 116 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1935)

Most recent

  1. McGowan v. McGowan4 Misc. 2d 165 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1950)
  2. Hanscom v. Irwin208 P.2d 330 (Or. 1949)
  3. In re the Estate of Wechsler171 Misc. 738 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1939)
  4. Frick v. Cone160 Misc. 450 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1936)
  5. Vickers v. Vickers156 Misc. 724 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1935)
  6. In re the Estate of Poth155 Misc. 116 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list