TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cruger v. Douglass

Henry D. Cruger v. . Douglass and Others.

Cruger v. Douglass, 2 N.Y. 571 (1850)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 5, 1850
Judges
Bronson
Citations
2 N.Y. 5714 How. Pr. 215
Headnotes
A decree which provides for a reference, and reserves iurlher directions until the coming in of the report, so that the cause must be set down again for hearing, before all parts of the litigation are disposed of, is not final, and therefore cannot be appealed from to this court, although it adjudicates upon the merits of the cause and disposes of the question of costs.
Summary
in person, moved to dismiss the appeal,' on the ground that the decree appealed from was not final. The suit was pending in the court of chancery before either of the codes were passed, and the decree or order appealed from was made by the supreme court in November, 1-848. The other facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. He cited Harris v. Clark, (4 How. P. R. 78.) cited 9 Paige’s R. 638 ; 6 Howard, 203.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bronson

Bronson, Ch. J.

The decree appealed from settles all the leading points in controversy between the parties, but it directs a reference for the purpose of ascertaining what real and personal estate falls within the operation of the decree; and directs "the referee to take and state an account between the parties. On the coming in and confirmation of the report, the amount found due to either party is to be paid by the other, “ at such time or times as shall be specified in said report;” and the sum of five thousand dollars is to be forthwith paid to the respondent, on account of the moneys which may be payable to him under the order or decree. The referee is to make his report with all convenient speed, “ to the end, that on the coming in and confirmation of his report, such further order and decree may be made thereon as shall be just.” It is also ordered, that neither party shall have costs as against the other; “ and that all further directions be reserved until the coming in of the said referee’s report.” Although the decree is final as to several particu *572 lars, it evidently is not so as to all. “Further directions” are reserved until the coming in of the report; and then “such further order and decree may be made thereon as shall be just.” It will be necessary to set the cause down for a further decree on the coming in of the report. The decree already made is not final; and the appeal was premature. The point was decided in Harris v Clark at the last July term."

Motion granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1852–1853: 11866–1867: 11882–1883: 11920–1921: 11926–1927: 118522026peak 1852 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wells v. Shriver1921 OK 122, 197 P. 460
  2. Cary v. Richardson35 La. Ann. 505 (1883)
  3. Garland v. Dimitry114 So. 718 (La. 1927)
  4. Belmont v. Ponvert3 Rob. 693 (1866)
  5. Beebe v. Griffing6 N.Y. 464 (1852)

Most recent

  1. Garland v. Dimitry114 So. 718 (La. 1927)
  2. Wells v. Shriver1921 OK 122, 197 P. 460
  3. Cary v. Richardson35 La. Ann. 505 (1883)
  4. Belmont v. Ponvert3 Rob. 693 (1866)
  5. Beebe v. Griffing6 N.Y. 464 (1852)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list