TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gilsey v. Keen

Henry Gilsey Et Al., Respondents, v. Albert R. Keen Et Al., Appellants. Same, Respondents, v. Same, Appellants

Gilsey v. Keen, 78 N.E. 1104 (N.Y. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 5, 1906
Citations
78 N.E. 1104185 N.Y. 5881906 N.Y. LEXIS 1026
Summary
Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of tlie Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in' the first judicial department, entered May 17, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in actions to recover amounts due for rent of leased premises.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment's affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gilsey v. Lancaster164 A.D. 663 (1914)

Most recent

  1. Gilsey v. Lancaster164 A.D. 663 (1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list