Lynn v. McCann
Edward Lynn, Appellant, v. Sarah A. McCann Respondent, Impleaded With Another
Lynn v. McCann, 123 N.E. 877 (N.Y. 1919)
Summary
Appeal from a judgment entered July 13, 1917, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury and directing a dismissal of the complaint as to the defendant, respondent. The action was to recover for legal services alleged to have been rendered in an action of ejectment brought against the respondent’s co-defendants. During the pendency "of the action said co-defendants conveyed their interest in the property in suit to the respondent. The plaintiff successfully defended the action and seeks to recover for his services, against defendant, respondent, on the theory of an implied promise. The Appellate Division held that under the circumstances she could elect to join in defending the ejectment action or remain passive and stand, on her deed for indemnity, and where she chose the latter course she could nút be held liable for the expense of defending the action, i Joseph McSweeney for appellant.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ. . .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.