Miller Bros. Hat Company v. A.D. Smith Sons Company
Miller Bros. Hat Company, Appellant, v. A. D. Smith Sons Company, Respondent
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The plaintiff made out a prima jade case of breach of contract for the sale of goods. On the facts, the complaint should not have been dismissed, but the jury should have been permitted to pass on the question whether the delivery of the samples was referable to the principal order and in recognition and part performance thereof.
*572 The practice of submitting photostatic copies of exhibits unaccompanied by printed copies thereof is condemned and a repetition of the offense will lead to the rejection of the record.
The judgment should be reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.
His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur; Lehman, J., not sitting.
Judgments reversed, etc.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.