TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hinckley v. Schwarszchild and Sulzberger Company

Sylvester B. Hinckley, Appellant, v. Schwarszchild and Sulzberger Company Et Al., Respondents

Hinckley v. Schwarszchild & Sulzberger Co., 86 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 6, 1908
Citations
86 N.E. 1125193 N.Y. 5991908 N.Y. LEXIS 690
Summary
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 1, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendant from issuing preferred stock. The motion was made under section 1298 of the Code of Civil Procedure upon the ground that the appellant had died, and that no order of substitution had been made within three months.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1909: 11927: 11928: 11934: 11939: 119092026peak 1909 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States87 N.E. 443 (N.Y. 1909)
  2. Bingham v. Savings Invest., C., E. Orange138 A. 659 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1927)
  3. In re Kinney18 N.E.2d 645 (N.Y. 1939)
  4. In re Silberkraus224 A.D. 268 (1928)
  5. McCaskell v. Purity Fibre Products Corp.22 Pa. D. & C. 1 (1934)

Most recent

  1. In re Kinney18 N.E.2d 645 (N.Y. 1939)
  2. McCaskell v. Purity Fibre Products Corp.22 Pa. D. & C. 1 (1934)
  3. In re Silberkraus224 A.D. 268 (1928)
  4. Bingham v. Savings Invest., C., E. Orange138 A. 659 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1927)
  5. Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States87 N.E. 443 (N.Y. 1909)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list