TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Peekskill, State Camp & Mohegan Railroad v. Village of Peekskill

The Peekskill, State Camp and Mohegan Railroad Company, Appellant, v. the Village of Peekskill, Respondent

Peekskill, State Camp & Mohegan R.R. v. Vill. of Peekskill, 59 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 8, 1901
Citations
59 N.E. 1128165 N.Y. 6281901 N.Y. LEXIS 1452
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme. Court in the second judicial department, entered October 8, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Curtis v. Van Bergh ( 161 N. Y. 47 ) and Ward v. Hudson River Building Co.

( 125 N. Y. 230 ).

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Bbien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1904: 11906: 11907: 119042026peak 1904 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. General Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.144 F. 458 (1906)
  2. South Shore Traction Co. v. Town of Brookhaven116 A.D. 749 (1907)
  3. Hattersly v. Waterville (Vil.)16 Ohio C.C. Dec. 226 (Oh. Circ. Ct., Lucas 1904)

Most recent

  1. South Shore Traction Co. v. Town of Brookhaven116 A.D. 749 (1907)
  2. General Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.144 F. 458 (1906)
  3. Hattersly v. Waterville (Vil.)16 Ohio C.C. Dec. 226 (Oh. Circ. Ct., Lucas 1904)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Ward v. Hudson River Bldg. Co., 26 N.E. 256 (N.Y. 1891) 78
Curtis v. Van Bergh, 55 N.E. 398 (N.Y. 1899) 41

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list