In re City of New York (Upper N.Y. Bay)
In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property on Upper New York Bay in the Borough of Richmond. Charles W. Berry, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant; Staten Island Railway Company, Respondent
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The Greater New York Charter, in section 981 thereof, provides that interest upon all sums awarded in condemnation proceedings shall cease to run “ six months after the date of the filing of the final decree ”
*67 unless “ within that time demand therefor, in writing, be served upon the comptroller.” The decree made at Special Term, providing for an award to claimant for lands taken, was modified by the Appellate Division, which made a decree providing for an award in a lesser amount. Within six months thereafter the claimant served a written notice upon the Comptroller demanding payment of the amount awarded by the modified decree, with interest. In our judgment, the notice was served upon the Comptroller within six months “ after the date of the filing of the final decree,” and, therefore, interest upon the award has not ceased to run. This was the holding in Matter of City of New York ( 209 App. Div. 662 ; affd., 239 N. Y. 524 ).
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur; Andrews and O’Brien, JJ., not sitting.
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.